Deep Dive
1. Supply Inflation Shock (Bearish Impact)
Overview: On August 11, 10,765 new LEASH tokens (10% of supply) were minted via a “rebase pathway” in its contract, despite prior assurances that rebasing was disabled. This breach of trust triggered panic selling.
What this means: The supply increase dilutes existing holders’ value and raises centralization concerns. Developer Kaal Dhairya admitted the flaw and proposed a DAO vote to migrate to LEASH v2, but uncertainty persists.
What to watch: DAO governance progress – a swift transition to a non-rebase contract could stabilize sentiment, while delays may prolong selling.
2. Security Fears From Hacked Wallet (Bearish Impact)
Overview: A Shiba Inu Deployer wallet linked to LEASH was hacked on August 14, raising fears of scam token launches.
What this means: While developers clarified that critical systems are unaffected (U.Today), the incident eroded confidence in LEASH’s ecosystem security, amplifying sell-offs.
3. Technical Weakness (Mixed Impact)
Overview: LEASH trades at $33.11, below all key moving averages (7-day SMA: $34.05; 200-day EMA: $142.01). The RSI (26.87) suggests oversold conditions, but MACD remains bearish (-21.42 vs. -22.92 signal line).
What this means: Oversold signals hint at possible short-term rebounds, but the lack of support levels and high Fibonacci retracement targets ($59.92–$141.56) indicate sustained bearish pressure.
Conclusion
LEASH’s decline stems from a toxic mix of sudden supply inflation, security anxieties, and broken technical supports. While oversold conditions could invite volatility-driven bounces, lasting recovery likely hinges on the DAO resolving supply governance and restoring trust.
Key watch: Will the LEASH v2 proposal gain DAO approval by September 10, 2025, to eliminate rebase risks?