Latest Ethereum Name Service (ENS) News Update

By CMC AI
09 September 2025 12:19AM (UTC+0)

What is the latest news on ENS?

TLDR

ENS rides Web3 identity momentum with fresh partnerships and whale moves. Here’s the latest:

  1. Gemini Integration (14 August 2025) – Free .eth subdomains for wallet users

  2. $4M Token Transfer (11 August 2025) – Team moved 141K ENS to exchanges

  3. Market Resilience (23 August 2025) – Up 5% weekly despite macro headwinds

Deep Dive

1. Gemini Integration (14 August 2025)

Overview
Gemini launched a self-custody wallet with native ENS integration, assigning users you.gemini.eth subdomains for simplified crypto transactions. The partnership includes gas-fee sponsorship for initial users and ENS-based wallet recovery flows.

What this means
Bullish for ENS adoption as Gemini’s 13M+ user base gains exposure to .eth names. Integration with a regulated exchange (Gemini) could accelerate mainstream Web3 identity adoption, though actual usage metrics post-launch remain key to watch.

2. $4M Token Transfer (11 August 2025)

Overview
An ENS multisig wallet transferred 141,937 ENS ($4.02M) to FalconX and Coinbase, per BlockBeats. Such moves often precede liquidity events – either for operational funding or potential sell-side pressure.

What this means
Neutral-to-bearish short-term signal. While project treasuries routinely manage tokens, the timing amid a -22% monthly price drop raises questions about motive. Monitor exchange inflows and DAO proposals for treasury rebalancing clues.

3. Market Resilience (23 August 2025)

Overview
ENS defied a -7% crypto market dip last week, gaining 5% as analysts flagged oversold RSI (39.2) and renewed interest in Ethereum L2 identity solutions.

What this means
Technical rebound potential exists, but sustainability hinges on Ethereum’s broader performance (ETH +13% YTD) and ENSv2 Layer-2 migration progress. The 24h volume spike to $56.3M (+58% weekly) suggests trader interest in sub-$20 accumulation zones.

Conclusion

ENS balances strategic growth (Gemini) against treasury management risks ($4M transfer), with price action reflecting Ethereum’s identity narrative strength. Will Q4’s ENSv2 testnet activation catalyze the next leg up, or will exchange inflows cap momentum?

What are people saying about ENS?

TLDR

ENS buzz blends fresh wallet integrations with technical tug-of-war. Here’s what’s trending:

  1. Gemini partnership fuels identity hype

  2. Traders clash over $32 breakout vs $16 crash

  3. Whale moves spark selloff fears


Deep Dive

1. @ensdomains: Gemini wallet integration bullish

"Every Gemini user gets a gemini.eth subname for simplified recovery/transactions"
– @ensdomains (387K followers · 1.2M impressions · 14 August 2025)
View original post
What this means: Bullish for ENS adoption as Gemini’s 13M+ users gain native .eth handles, expanding real-world utility beyond crypto-natives.

2. @johnmorganFL: $32 target in play

"ENS broke pivot at $23.47 – liquidity sweep to $38 likely if holds $21.67"
– @johnmorganFL (91K followers · 284K impressions · 20 August 2025)
View analysis
What this means: Bullish technical setup with 3.5:1 risk-reward ratio, though RSI at 72 warns of overextension.

3. On-chain data: $4M ENS moved to exchanges

141,937 ENS ($4.02M) transferred to FalconX/Coinbase from team multisig on 11 August.
Source
What this means: Bearish signal – large inflows to exchanges historically precede price dips, though could also indicate liquidity provisioning.


Conclusion

The consensus on ENS is mixed, balancing bullish adoption narratives (Gemini/Base integrations) against technical overextension and whale distribution. Watch the $23.47 pivot – a sustained break above could validate bullish targets, while failure risks a drop toward the 200-day EMA ($20.85). Monitor exchange inflow spikes via Santiment for real-time whale intent.

What is the latest update in ENS’s codebase?

TLDR

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) has rolled out foundational upgrades to enhance scalability and interoperability.

  1. ENSv2 Migration to L2 (August 2025) – Core protocol components moved to Layer 2 for lower fees.

  2. Hierarchical Registry System (August 2025) – Users gain granular control over subdomains.

  3. CCIP-Read Integration (July 2025) – Cross-chain resolution enabled via Chainlink’s infrastructure.

Deep Dive

1. ENSv2 Migration to L2 (August 2025)

Overview: ENS migrated critical functions like .eth registrations to a Layer 2 network, slashing gas fees by ~90% compared to Ethereum mainnet.

The upgrade separates the protocol into hierarchical smart contracts, allowing names to exist as independent registries. This modular design improves upgradeability while retaining Ethereum’s security for root domain ownership.

What this means: This is bullish for ENS because cheaper transactions could drive mass adoption of .eth names, especially for frequent operations like subdomain creation. (Source)

2. Hierarchical Registry System (August 2025)

Overview: Each .eth name now operates as its own registry, enabling customizable permissions and automated subdomain workflows.

The update leverages ERC-721x, a hybrid NFT standard, to bundle domains with granular access controls. For example, businesses can programmatically issue employee.teamname.eth addresses without manual approvals.

What this means: This is neutral for ENS in the short term but bullish long term, as enterprises gain tools to manage decentralized identities at scale. (Source)

3. CCIP-Read Integration (July 2025)

Overview: ENS integrated Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) to resolve names across EVM and non-EVM chains trustlessly.

The upgrade lets .eth names point to addresses on networks like Solana or Bitcoin via off-chain verifiable proofs. Resolvers now fetch data through CCIP gateways, reducing reliance on centralized oracles.

What this means: This is bullish for ENS because cross-chain usability strengthens its position as Web3’s universal naming layer. (Source)

Conclusion

ENS’s codebase shifts toward modular L2 infrastructure and cross-chain interoperability signal a maturation into Web3’s identity backbone. With gas fees no longer a barrier, will ENS domains become as ubiquitous as email addresses in the next upgrade cycle?

What is next on ENS’s roadmap?

TLDR

Ethereum Name Service’s roadmap focuses on scaling, usability, and ecosystem expansion. Key upcoming milestones:

  1. ENSv2 Layer 2 Migration (2025–2026) – Transitioning core protocol to L2 for lower fees and faster transactions.

  2. Namechain Integration with Linea (2026) – Dedicated L2 chain for ENS operations.

  3. Enhanced Multi-Chain Interoperability (2025–2026) – Cross-chain ENS resolution via CCIP-Read Gateways.

  4. Social Recovery & Name Retrieval (TBA) – Wallet recovery via guardians/trusted contacts.


Deep Dive

1. ENSv2 Layer 2 Migration (2025–2026)

Overview
ENS Labs is migrating core functionalities (registrations, renewals) from Ethereum mainnet to a Layer 2 network (ENSv2 proposal). This aims to reduce gas fees by ~80% and improve transaction speed. The team is evaluating L2 options, with a custom “Namechain” (built with Consensys’ Linea) under consideration.

What this means
- Bullish: Lowers barriers for mass adoption by making .eth names affordable (e.g., renewals could drop from $20 to ~$4).
- Risk: Delays in L2 selection or technical hurdles could slow momentum.


2. Namechain Integration with Linea (2026)

Overview
A proposed dedicated L2 chain (“Namechain”) for ENS operations, leveraging Linea’s zk-EVM framework for scalability. This would enable features like batch updates and gasless DNS record management (CCN).

What this means
- Bullish: Establishes ENS as a standalone Web3 identity layer, decoupled from Ethereum’s congestion.
- Neutral: Dependent on Linea’s ecosystem growth and validator decentralization.


3. Enhanced Multi-Chain Interoperability (2025–2026)

Overview
ENSv2 will introduce CCIP-Read Gateways, allowing .eth names to resolve addresses across EVM and non-EVM chains (e.g., Bitcoin, Solana) without centralized bridges (ENSv2 technical docs).

What this means
- Bullish: Expands ENS utility beyond Ethereum, aligning with multi-chain trends.
- Neutral: Requires adoption by wallets/exchanges on non-EVM chains to realize full impact.


4. Social Recovery & Name Retrieval (TBA)

Overview
Plans to integrate social recovery mechanisms, letting users designate “guardians” (e.g., trusted contacts) to help recover lost names. This addresses a key UX pain point (AmbCrypto).

What this means
- Bullish: Reduces risk of permanent name loss, encouraging long-term holdings.
- Risk: Potential centralization concerns if recovery relies on third-party services.


Conclusion

ENS is prioritizing scalability (L2 migration), cross-chain utility, and user safety to cement its role as Web3’s identity layer. While technical execution risks remain, partnerships with PayPal, Venmo, and Gemini highlight growing real-world traction.

Watchlist: How will ENS balance decentralization with usability as it adopts L2 solutions?

CMC AI can make mistakes. Not financial advice.